Comments on: Conan Takes on STUDIO 60 http://www.thetvaddict.com/2007/04/16/conan-takes-on-studio-60/ theTVaddict.com is your number one source on the net for TV news, scoop, reviews and commentary on all of your favourite TV shows. Check out theTVaddict.com daily for commentary, a WHAT TO WATCH TVguide, and a weekly podcast. Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:26:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Evin http://www.thetvaddict.com/2007/04/16/conan-takes-on-studio-60/comment-page-1/#comment-84978 Evin Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:19:17 +0000 http://thetvaddict.com/2007/04/16/conan-takes-on-studio-60/#comment-84978 To the individual above me, as an American you are entitled to your own wrong opinion. Studio 60 had witty dialogue, interesting social commentary, and characters that were enjoyable to watch. Of course me being an American I am subject to the exact statement I directed at you, but damn it! Me and a number of friends really enjoyed that show, and I suppose we can only hope that NBC will let it linger around for a little while longer. To the individual above me, as an American you are entitled to your own wrong opinion. Studio 60 had witty dialogue, interesting social commentary, and characters that were enjoyable to watch. Of course me being an American I am subject to the exact statement I directed at you, but damn it! Me and a number of friends really enjoyed that show, and I suppose we can only hope that NBC will let it linger around for a little while longer.

]]> By: Mike Hutchins http://www.thetvaddict.com/2007/04/16/conan-takes-on-studio-60/comment-page-1/#comment-63168 Mike Hutchins Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:00:59 +0000 http://thetvaddict.com/2007/04/16/conan-takes-on-studio-60/#comment-63168 I thought it was very funny. They nailed the pretension and jaw-droppingly cliche' manner of Studio 60. All they missed were the Three's Company level plotlines and they'd have have really got it right. As to the Studio 60 supporters, some of whom have posted comments here: I understand you want the show to be good, and that it has brief flashes of quality, but it's time to admit it sucks. It's time to grow up. I thought it was very funny. They nailed the pretension and jaw-droppingly cliche’ manner of Studio 60. All they missed were the Three’s Company level plotlines and they’d have have really got it right. As to the Studio 60 supporters, some of whom have posted comments here: I understand you want the show to be good, and that it has brief flashes of quality, but it’s time to admit it sucks. It’s time to grow up.

]]> By: bill http://www.thetvaddict.com/2007/04/16/conan-takes-on-studio-60/comment-page-1/#comment-60940 bill Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:12:55 +0000 http://thetvaddict.com/2007/04/16/conan-takes-on-studio-60/#comment-60940 Yeah, sorry, but TGYH is alot funnier than that Conan clip. Although I did like the mocking of Danny and Harriet. Yeah, sorry, but TGYH is alot funnier than that Conan clip. Although I did like the mocking of Danny and Harriet.

]]> By: thawtful http://www.thetvaddict.com/2007/04/16/conan-takes-on-studio-60/comment-page-1/#comment-60932 thawtful Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:36:33 +0000 http://thetvaddict.com/2007/04/16/conan-takes-on-studio-60/#comment-60932 Don't you find it odd that Conan is just now getting around to jabbing at Studio 60 -- the show's been off the air since mid February. Is he trying to help Tina Fey (known hater of all things Sorkin that might threaten her piddly show)? What does Conan know that the rest of don't? Studio 60 did better in the Monday night slot than any of its replacements. And for all this talk of it costing too much, go look at the Hollywood Reporter's article on pilots. It mentions the average costs of a drama series as being over 3 million an episode -- just like Studio 60! So for all the putting down of this series, maybe people should start to recognize the show had potential -- if Zucker and Reilly had supported it! Don’t you find it odd that Conan is just now getting around to jabbing at Studio 60 — the show’s been off the air since mid February. Is he trying to help Tina Fey (known hater of all things Sorkin that might threaten her piddly show)? What does Conan know that the rest of don’t? Studio 60 did better in the Monday night slot than any of its replacements. And for all this talk of it costing too much, go look at the Hollywood Reporter’s article on pilots. It mentions the average costs of a drama series as being over 3 million an episode — just like Studio 60! So for all the putting down of this series, maybe people should start to recognize the show had potential — if Zucker and Reilly had supported it!

]]> By: Greg http://www.thetvaddict.com/2007/04/16/conan-takes-on-studio-60/comment-page-1/#comment-60917 Greg Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:57:21 +0000 http://thetvaddict.com/2007/04/16/conan-takes-on-studio-60/#comment-60917 I agree, Thank God You're Here isn't worth the pixels on my tv screen... but that Conan clip.. well, frankly, I thought it sucked.. And I'm a huge fan of his "shorts" (that didn't sound good) normally, but like "Studio 60", I found it flat and uninspired. (At least they got the Sorkin fallacy of alcohol in the workplace right... has there ever been an episode of one of his show's that the characters didn't crack open a beer or have a glass of scotch AT WORK???) Great site btw.. Greg www.denvertvguy.com I agree, Thank God You’re Here isn’t worth the pixels on my tv screen… but that Conan clip.. well, frankly, I thought it sucked..

And I’m a huge fan of his “shorts” (that didn’t sound good) normally, but like “Studio 60″, I found it flat and uninspired.

(At least they got the Sorkin fallacy of alcohol in the workplace right… has there ever been an episode of one of his show’s that the characters didn’t crack open a beer or have a glass of scotch AT WORK???)

Great site btw..

Greg
http://www.denvertvguy.com

]]>