<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Channel Surfing with C.T.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetvaddict.com/2008/02/07/channel-surfing-with-ct-38/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2008/02/07/channel-surfing-with-ct-38/</link>
	<description>theTVaddict.com is your number one source on the net for TV news, scoop, reviews and commentary on all of your favourite TV shows. Check out theTVaddict.com daily for commentary, a WHAT TO WATCH TVguide, and a weekly podcast.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie P</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2008/02/07/channel-surfing-with-ct-38/comment-page-1/#comment-249555</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 06:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2008/02/07/channel-surfing-with-ct-38/#comment-249555</guid>
		<description>Loved OTH this week. CT- I cracked up at your Bitchtoria reference.  Cant wait to see how the whole nanny thing pans out, I kinda got chills when I saw Nathan watching her in the pool.  
Am I the only one that doesnt really like Lukes girlfriend?? My friends and I disagree about it, some of them like her, and I dont. 

And I was so pumped that Paradise Hotel started that I almost ( almost being the operative word) watched it right when it aired instead of waiting for tivo to record it! I just dont see how these new people can possibly compare to the crazies on PH 1.  I hope they do though. Its kinda like Big Brother, every year I swear I will hate the new houseguests compared to the previous season but usually end up liking them more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved OTH this week. CT- I cracked up at your Bitchtoria reference.  Cant wait to see how the whole nanny thing pans out, I kinda got chills when I saw Nathan watching her in the pool.<br />
Am I the only one that doesnt really like Lukes girlfriend?? My friends and I disagree about it, some of them like her, and I dont. </p>
<p>And I was so pumped that Paradise Hotel started that I almost ( almost being the operative word) watched it right when it aired instead of waiting for tivo to record it! I just dont see how these new people can possibly compare to the crazies on PH 1.  I hope they do though. Its kinda like Big Brother, every year I swear I will hate the new houseguests compared to the previous season but usually end up liking them more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Wilkins</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2008/02/07/channel-surfing-with-ct-38/comment-page-1/#comment-249541</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Wilkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2008/02/07/channel-surfing-with-ct-38/#comment-249541</guid>
		<description>I agree about the election results.  How is it the news declares a winner when only 5% are reporting?  Report the News after the Facts.  As for DAYS, I was just glad to see the character return.  I&#039;m not feeling all of the storylines and if that Dena Higley is coming on board, well, I can only hope she doesn&#039;t put the final nail in &quot;Days&quot; coffin.  I mean, it&#039;s the only soap NBC has.  Lets see how many bad plots from &quot;One Life to Live&quot; she reuses to bad effect.  I hope she doesn&#039;t &quot;kill&quot; Days.  As for firing the whole staff, it&#039;s cheaper to start over with a staff that isn&#039;t &quot;making the $&quot; the old staff did.  It&#039;s all about $.  lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about the election results.  How is it the news declares a winner when only 5% are reporting?  Report the News after the Facts.  As for DAYS, I was just glad to see the character return.  I&#8217;m not feeling all of the storylines and if that Dena Higley is coming on board, well, I can only hope she doesn&#8217;t put the final nail in &#8220;Days&#8221; coffin.  I mean, it&#8217;s the only soap NBC has.  Lets see how many bad plots from &#8220;One Life to Live&#8221; she reuses to bad effect.  I hope she doesn&#8217;t &#8220;kill&#8221; Days.  As for firing the whole staff, it&#8217;s cheaper to start over with a staff that isn&#8217;t &#8220;making the $&#8221; the old staff did.  It&#8217;s all about $.  lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda B.</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2008/02/07/channel-surfing-with-ct-38/comment-page-1/#comment-249535</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 22:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2008/02/07/channel-surfing-with-ct-38/#comment-249535</guid>
		<description>CT, you&#039;re completely right. I live in Missouri and went to bed disappointed that Hillary won our state. Then when i woke up the next morning found out she did not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CT, you&#8217;re completely right. I live in Missouri and went to bed disappointed that Hillary won our state. Then when i woke up the next morning found out she did not!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2008/02/07/channel-surfing-with-ct-38/comment-page-1/#comment-249526</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2008/02/07/channel-surfing-with-ct-38/#comment-249526</guid>
		<description>Josh: 

You&#039;re completely right about MSNBC. I&#039;m afraid when writing this, I did a pretty poor job of making it clear I was talking about two completely different issues: One is the premature announcement of &quot;winners&quot; in primary races when the votes have not yet been counter; the other was networks racing to give election coverage. At least one of my local affiliates was providing projected winners two hours before the polling places closed. AAs for premature calling, several networks  and other media outlets (including the AP) prematurely called Missouri as going to Hillary when, in fact, it had gone to Obama. It&#039;s sloppy and, frankly, there&#039;s no reason for it except that they are desperate to be the first to get the information out there rather than wait until everything is finalized. They know they can&#039;t compete with the web. When I worked at a newspaper, we had the same problem: With deadlines looming, at what point to you make the call?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh: </p>
<p>You&#8217;re completely right about MSNBC. I&#8217;m afraid when writing this, I did a pretty poor job of making it clear I was talking about two completely different issues: One is the premature announcement of &#8220;winners&#8221; in primary races when the votes have not yet been counter; the other was networks racing to give election coverage. At least one of my local affiliates was providing projected winners two hours before the polling places closed. AAs for premature calling, several networks  and other media outlets (including the AP) prematurely called Missouri as going to Hillary when, in fact, it had gone to Obama. It&#8217;s sloppy and, frankly, there&#8217;s no reason for it except that they are desperate to be the first to get the information out there rather than wait until everything is finalized. They know they can&#8217;t compete with the web. When I worked at a newspaper, we had the same problem: With deadlines looming, at what point to you make the call?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2008/02/07/channel-surfing-with-ct-38/comment-page-1/#comment-249525</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2008/02/07/channel-surfing-with-ct-38/#comment-249525</guid>
		<description>Linda: 

All of the writers have an option of going what is called &quot;financial core&quot;. It means they can continue writing but, as I understand it, aren&#039;t protected by the union (although they will continue to be members and have to pay dues). Any writer can go fi-core and write, although it&#039;s frowned upon. Several soaps have people who have done that. Rumor has it that many other shows simply are working with hush-hush scabs who go to great lengths to get the scripts to the shows without being identified as the writer. You&#039;ll notice that several soaps currently do not list who they are being written by. That&#039;s to protect the identity of the scabs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linda: </p>
<p>All of the writers have an option of going what is called &#8220;financial core&#8221;. It means they can continue writing but, as I understand it, aren&#8217;t protected by the union (although they will continue to be members and have to pay dues). Any writer can go fi-core and write, although it&#8217;s frowned upon. Several soaps have people who have done that. Rumor has it that many other shows simply are working with hush-hush scabs who go to great lengths to get the scripts to the shows without being identified as the writer. You&#8217;ll notice that several soaps currently do not list who they are being written by. That&#8217;s to protect the identity of the scabs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shanna</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2008/02/07/channel-surfing-with-ct-38/comment-page-1/#comment-249521</link>
		<dc:creator>shanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2008/02/07/channel-surfing-with-ct-38/#comment-249521</guid>
		<description>ITA about One Tree Hill. For me Skillz and Jamie make the show and the four year jump has made everything more enjoyable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ITA about One Tree Hill. For me Skillz and Jamie make the show and the four year jump has made everything more enjoyable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Emerson</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2008/02/07/channel-surfing-with-ct-38/comment-page-1/#comment-249517</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Emerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2008/02/07/channel-surfing-with-ct-38/#comment-249517</guid>
		<description>The networks don&#039;t give election results before voting has ended. I don&#039;t know what exactly you were watching, but MSNBC specifically displays a counter on the screen to show when the polls close in each area, and they do not give any results or exit poll information before that time. I have yet to see any network that has called a result before polling has ended. So no, no one sees that a candidate has won before going to their polling place because that&#039;s not possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The networks don&#8217;t give election results before voting has ended. I don&#8217;t know what exactly you were watching, but MSNBC specifically displays a counter on the screen to show when the polls close in each area, and they do not give any results or exit poll information before that time. I have yet to see any network that has called a result before polling has ended. So no, no one sees that a candidate has won before going to their polling place because that&#8217;s not possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda B.</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2008/02/07/channel-surfing-with-ct-38/comment-page-1/#comment-249515</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2008/02/07/channel-surfing-with-ct-38/#comment-249515</guid>
		<description>When will soap operas start being affected by the writer&#039;s strike? Do they all just have months and months of scripts in the can and that&#039;s why they&#039;re all still on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will soap operas start being affected by the writer&#8217;s strike? Do they all just have months and months of scripts in the can and that&#8217;s why they&#8217;re all still on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

