<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Talkback: Golden Globe Nominations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetvaddict.com/2008/12/11/tv-talkback-golden-globe-nominations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2008/12/11/tv-talkback-golden-globe-nominations/</link>
	<description>theTVaddict.com is your number one source on the net for TV news, scoop, reviews and commentary on all of your favourite TV shows. Check out theTVaddict.com daily for commentary, a WHAT TO WATCH TVguide, and a weekly podcast.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hil</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2008/12/11/tv-talkback-golden-globe-nominations/comment-page-1/#comment-265750</link>
		<dc:creator>Hil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2008/12/11/tv-talkback-golden-globe-nominations/#comment-265750</guid>
		<description>Cranford was pretty good. I typically don&#039;t care for that category because I&#039;ve very rarely watch any of them anyway, but I actually did watch Cranford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cranford was pretty good. I typically don&#8217;t care for that category because I&#8217;ve very rarely watch any of them anyway, but I actually did watch Cranford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2008/12/11/tv-talkback-golden-globe-nominations/comment-page-1/#comment-265717</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2008/12/11/tv-talkback-golden-globe-nominations/#comment-265717</guid>
		<description>Was Damages eligible? I assumed it wasn&#039;t, since new episodes haven&#039;t aired for a pretty long time. Close and Byrne were both nominated last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was Damages eligible? I assumed it wasn&#8217;t, since new episodes haven&#8217;t aired for a pretty long time. Close and Byrne were both nominated last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aleks</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2008/12/11/tv-talkback-golden-globe-nominations/comment-page-1/#comment-265715</link>
		<dc:creator>Aleks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2008/12/11/tv-talkback-golden-globe-nominations/#comment-265715</guid>
		<description>Cranford=PBS movie starring Judi Dench, and actually pretty good.  

Also, I thought it was weird how In Treatment, which had the lowest ratings of all the show nominated, got the most nominations. 

And no nods for The Wire OR The Shield? Sacrilege!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cranford=PBS movie starring Judi Dench, and actually pretty good.  </p>
<p>Also, I thought it was weird how In Treatment, which had the lowest ratings of all the show nominated, got the most nominations. </p>
<p>And no nods for The Wire OR The Shield? Sacrilege!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

