<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of Nathan Fillion&#8217;s CASTLE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/</link>
	<description>theTVaddict.com is your number one source on the net for TV news, scoop, reviews and commentary on all of your favourite TV shows. Check out theTVaddict.com daily for commentary, a WHAT TO WATCH TVguide, and a weekly podcast.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/comment-page-1/#comment-304611</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/#comment-304611</guid>
		<description>I missed the latest episode of Castle and forgot to set my DVR, but luckily I was able to catch up with them at DISH Online. As an employee of DISH Network I had heard about this awhile back but now that it’s live and I’ve had a chance to use it I’m really excited about it. You can catch the latest episode of Castle here if you missed it too: http://beta.dishonline.com/shows/21994-castle/videos/842735-slice_of_death</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed the latest episode of Castle and forgot to set my DVR, but luckily I was able to catch up with them at DISH Online. As an employee of DISH Network I had heard about this awhile back but now that it’s live and I’ve had a chance to use it I’m really excited about it. You can catch the latest episode of Castle here if you missed it too: <a href="http://beta.dishonline.com/shows/21994-castle/videos/842735-slice_of_death" rel="nofollow">http://beta.dishonline.com/shows/21994-castle/videos/842735-slice_of_death</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/comment-page-1/#comment-272846</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 22:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/#comment-272846</guid>
		<description>Any show that has Fillion basically playing himself as some character--smuggler, outlaw, mystery writer... whatever--is always worth watching. The guy is just fun to watch. And what show hasn&#039;t started off with stereotypes that grew into their own? As long as &#039;Castle&#039; is on, I&#039;ll be watching it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any show that has Fillion basically playing himself as some character&#8211;smuggler, outlaw, mystery writer&#8230; whatever&#8211;is always worth watching. The guy is just fun to watch. And what show hasn&#8217;t started off with stereotypes that grew into their own? As long as &#8216;Castle&#8217; is on, I&#8217;ll be watching it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerrie</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/comment-page-1/#comment-270844</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/#comment-270844</guid>
		<description>Who is the female poker player/  Love the show!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is the female poker player/  Love the show!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty Ew</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/comment-page-1/#comment-270283</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty Ew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/#comment-270283</guid>
		<description>anyone know who the poker players were in episode 1? 1 with beard appeared to be Stephen j Cannell...don&#039;t know who the other man with glasses or the woman was...just wondered if they were cameo appearances by other writers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anyone know who the poker players were in episode 1? 1 with beard appeared to be Stephen j Cannell&#8230;don&#8217;t know who the other man with glasses or the woman was&#8230;just wondered if they were cameo appearances by other writers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathanael</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/comment-page-1/#comment-270269</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathanael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/#comment-270269</guid>
		<description>I was really expecting the pilot to be lame, but I was honestly surprised. Sure, it was cliche and corny, but it was actually entertaining (mainly due to Fillion&#039;s performance).

I&#039;m concerned, though, that past the first episode it will devolve into yet another goofy-cop crime-solving show. Since the &quot;murders inspired by the books&quot; storyline was apparently only one episode long, it would seem that it will now revert to standard procedural territory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was really expecting the pilot to be lame, but I was honestly surprised. Sure, it was cliche and corny, but it was actually entertaining (mainly due to Fillion&#8217;s performance).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m concerned, though, that past the first episode it will devolve into yet another goofy-cop crime-solving show. Since the &#8220;murders inspired by the books&#8221; storyline was apparently only one episode long, it would seem that it will now revert to standard procedural territory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/comment-page-1/#comment-270259</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 01:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/#comment-270259</guid>
		<description>What authors did cameos in the poker game.  I recognized Patterson, but who was the grey haired guy?  I have been racking my brain trying to figure it out.  Email me.  cole_turner@att.net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What authors did cameos in the poker game.  I recognized Patterson, but who was the grey haired guy?  I have been racking my brain trying to figure it out.  Email me.  <a href="mailto:cole_turner@att.net">cole_turner@att.net</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/comment-page-1/#comment-270191</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/#comment-270191</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you.. I enjoyed it... it wasn&#039;t the best show but I think the chemistry was good... I&#039;ll keep watching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you.. I enjoyed it&#8230; it wasn&#8217;t the best show but I think the chemistry was good&#8230; I&#8217;ll keep watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hil</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/comment-page-1/#comment-270095</link>
		<dc:creator>Hil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/#comment-270095</guid>
		<description>Having finally seen it all it seemed to me to be a light and harmless show. Similar to Bones minus the lab. I don&#039;t know how anyone can call it &quot;muddled&quot;. It was very straightforward and easy to follow. You could argue it was too easy going, but that is about it. Going back old school tv it reminded me a little bit of Remington Steele with the dynamic they are going with the characters and the humor level. Of course being compared to the complexity of a 1980s show isn&#039;t the best thing either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having finally seen it all it seemed to me to be a light and harmless show. Similar to Bones minus the lab. I don&#8217;t know how anyone can call it &#8220;muddled&#8221;. It was very straightforward and easy to follow. You could argue it was too easy going, but that is about it. Going back old school tv it reminded me a little bit of Remington Steele with the dynamic they are going with the characters and the humor level. Of course being compared to the complexity of a 1980s show isn&#8217;t the best thing either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: v</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/comment-page-1/#comment-270093</link>
		<dc:creator>v</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/#comment-270093</guid>
		<description>Like Fillion but I turned off the TV after Castle&#039;s first half... not a keeper!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Fillion but I turned off the TV after Castle&#8217;s first half&#8230; not a keeper!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/comment-page-1/#comment-270091</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/03/11/in-defense-of-nathan-fillions-castle/#comment-270091</guid>
		<description>I thought the show was really good. I enjoyed the boyish charm of Fillion although I wasn&#039;t crazy about the woman detective. I liked the mom and the daughter. A little light entertainment is just the ticket at the end of a long hard day. With Chuck and Castle as bookends, who needs more? And I liked the cameos!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the show was really good. I enjoyed the boyish charm of Fillion although I wasn&#8217;t crazy about the woman detective. I liked the mom and the daughter. A little light entertainment is just the ticket at the end of a long hard day. With Chuck and Castle as bookends, who needs more? And I liked the cameos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

