<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Ratings: Wednesday March 11, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/03/12/tv-ratings-wednesday-march-11-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/03/12/tv-ratings-wednesday-march-11-2009/</link>
	<description>theTVaddict.com is your number one source on the net for TV news, scoop, reviews and commentary on all of your favourite TV shows. Check out theTVaddict.com daily for commentary, a WHAT TO WATCH TVguide, and a weekly podcast.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/03/12/tv-ratings-wednesday-march-11-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-270163</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/03/12/tv-ratings-wednesday-march-11-2009/#comment-270163</guid>
		<description>Josh C.
I guess that would explain the whole cancellation thing.  But it is pretty sad for the CW that one of their top shows just barely out performs a show that has been axed by ABC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh C.<br />
I guess that would explain the whole cancellation thing.  But it is pretty sad for the CW that one of their top shows just barely out performs a show that has been axed by ABC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theTVaddict</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/03/12/tv-ratings-wednesday-march-11-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-270149</link>
		<dc:creator>theTVaddict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 03:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/03/12/tv-ratings-wednesday-march-11-2009/#comment-270149</guid>
		<description>Josh C.
Well now you know, and as the saying goes, knowing is half the battle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh C.<br />
Well now you know, and as the saying goes, knowing is half the battle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh C.</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/03/12/tv-ratings-wednesday-march-11-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-270147</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 03:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/03/12/tv-ratings-wednesday-march-11-2009/#comment-270147</guid>
		<description>I unapologetically love ANTM but had no idea it was outperforming life on mars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I unapologetically love ANTM but had no idea it was outperforming life on mars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/03/12/tv-ratings-wednesday-march-11-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-270137</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/03/12/tv-ratings-wednesday-march-11-2009/#comment-270137</guid>
		<description>wow, i guess it puts things into a little perspective with the ratings. i thought people might actually be interested in GOOD shows. especially since Lost has been nothing short of astounding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, i guess it puts things into a little perspective with the ratings. i thought people might actually be interested in GOOD shows. especially since Lost has been nothing short of astounding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/03/12/tv-ratings-wednesday-march-11-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-270129</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/03/12/tv-ratings-wednesday-march-11-2009/#comment-270129</guid>
		<description>over one million people watching repeats of 90210? i mean, i catch the episodes, but i haven&#039;t seen a single one i&#039;d want to revisit yet! haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>over one million people watching repeats of 90210? i mean, i catch the episodes, but i haven&#8217;t seen a single one i&#8217;d want to revisit yet! haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/03/12/tv-ratings-wednesday-march-11-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-270124</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/03/12/tv-ratings-wednesday-march-11-2009/#comment-270124</guid>
		<description>Wow ratings at 8 PM were practially non-existent.  It would be interesting to see what cable ratings were like at that point.  I&#039;m suprised that Lie to Me is doing so well.  I found the show predictable and fairly boring.  The only interesting parts were when they matched up facial expressions to pictures from history.  And those were few and far between.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow ratings at 8 PM were practially non-existent.  It would be interesting to see what cable ratings were like at that point.  I&#8217;m suprised that Lie to Me is doing so well.  I found the show predictable and fairly boring.  The only interesting parts were when they matched up facial expressions to pictures from history.  And those were few and far between.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

