<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Ratings: Tuesday December 1, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/12/02/tv-ratings-tuesday-december-1-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/12/02/tv-ratings-tuesday-december-1-2009/</link>
	<description>theTVaddict.com is your number one source on the net for TV news, scoop, reviews and commentary on all of your favourite TV shows. Check out theTVaddict.com daily for commentary, a WHAT TO WATCH TVguide, and a weekly podcast.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/12/02/tv-ratings-tuesday-december-1-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-283489</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/?p=9911#comment-283489</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what I was thinking.  The decision still seems so strange to me.  I know it is more expensive to make, but Pushing Daisies was making better numbers and brought more critical acclaim to ABC!  Just sayin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what I was thinking.  The decision still seems so strange to me.  I know it is more expensive to make, but Pushing Daisies was making better numbers and brought more critical acclaim to ABC!  Just sayin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theTVaddict</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/12/02/tv-ratings-tuesday-december-1-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-283473</link>
		<dc:creator>theTVaddict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/?p=9911#comment-283473</guid>
		<description>Considering ABC &#039;saved&#039; SCRUBS for a &#039;high-profile&#039; December launch (Note sarcasm!) I&#039;m sure those numbers were exactly what ABC was expecting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering ABC &#8216;saved&#8217; SCRUBS for a &#8216;high-profile&#8217; December launch (Note sarcasm!) I&#8217;m sure those numbers were exactly what ABC was expecting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2009/12/02/tv-ratings-tuesday-december-1-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-283470</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/?p=9911#comment-283470</guid>
		<description>Do you think those were the numbers ABC was expecting for Scrubs?  I mean, those were about what it did last year...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think those were the numbers ABC was expecting for Scrubs?  I mean, those were about what it did last year&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

