<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>the TV addict &#187; advertising anarchy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetvaddict.com/category/advertising-anarchy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com</link>
	<description>theTVaddict.com is your number one source on the net for TV news, scoop, reviews and commentary on all of your favourite TV shows. Check out theTVaddict.com daily for commentary, a WHAT TO WATCH TVguide, and a weekly podcast.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:23:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising Anarchy: ALCATRAZ</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2012/01/16/advertising-anarchy-alcatraz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2012/01/16/advertising-anarchy-alcatraz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theTVaddict</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcatraz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetvaddict.com/?p=30468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perfectly timed to coincide with tonight&#8217;s series premiere of ALCATRAZ on Fox (CityTV in Canada) comes theTVaddict.com&#8217;s latest edition of &#8220;Advertising Anarchy,&#8221; our continuous series in which we offer Hollywood some unsolicited advice on how they might wish to promote their wares to an increasingly skeptical audience. You&#8217;re welcome.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/alcatraz_poster.jpg" alt="" title="alcatraz_poster" width="385" height="578" class="border" /></p>
<p>Perfectly timed to coincide with tonight&#8217;s series premiere of <b>ALCATRAZ</b> on Fox (CityTV in Canada) comes theTVaddict.com&#8217;s latest edition of <a href="http://www.thetvaddict.com/category/advertising-anarchy/" target="newwindow">&#8220;Advertising Anarchy,&#8221;</a> our continuous series in which we offer Hollywood some unsolicited advice on how they might wish to promote their wares to an increasingly skeptical audience. You&#8217;re welcome. <img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/images/favicon.png"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2012/01/16/advertising-anarchy-alcatraz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising Anarchy: The Evolution of [the CW] Man</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/08/31/advertising-anarchy-the-evolution-of-the-cw-man/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/08/31/advertising-anarchy-the-evolution-of-the-cw-man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 21:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theTVaddict</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CW News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetvaddict.com/?p=26615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you ready for an Extreme Makeover: CW Network Edition? Considering your very own TV Addict is inching uncomfortably closer and closer to the top end of the Network&#8217;s 18-to-34 demographic is, we sure as heck are! Which is why, in addition to applauding newly-minted CW President Mark Pedowitz on his attempt to broaden the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/ringer-cast.jpg" alt="" title="ringer-cast" width="385" height="256" class="border" /></p>
<p>Are you ready for an Extreme Makeover: CW Network Edition? Considering your very own TV Addict is inching uncomfortably closer and closer to the top end of the Network&#8217;s 18-to-34 demographic is, we sure as heck are! Which is why, in addition to applauding newly-minted CW President Mark Pedowitz on his attempt to broaden the Network&#8217;s appeal with more adult-driven fare such as RINGER and NIKITA, we thought we&#8217;d — as we are wont to do — go one step further by offering up a little unsolicited advice in the form of our latest instalment of <a href="http://www.thetvaddict.com/category/advertising-anarchy/" target="Newwindow">Advertising Anarchy</a> (Also known as <i>our</i> take on how networks might wish to consider promoting some of our favorite new and returning shows ). Because let&#8217;s face it, our little CW Network is finally growing up! See for yourself, after the jump. <span id="more-26615"></span></p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/evolution_of_cw_man1.jpg" target="Newwindow"><img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/evolution_of_cw_man2.jpg" alt="" title="evolution_of_cw_man2" width="385" height="151" class="border" /><br />Click on the image for a larger version!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/08/31/advertising-anarchy-the-evolution-of-the-cw-man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising Anarchy: We Have a Little Fun with NBC&#8217;s Just Released Fall Key Art for WHITNEY, PRIME SUSPECT, THE PLAYBOY CLUB &amp; More!</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/08/15/advertising-anarchy-we-have-a-little-fun-with-nbcs-just-released-fall-key-art-for-whitney-prime-suspect-the-playboy-club-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/08/15/advertising-anarchy-we-have-a-little-fun-with-nbcs-just-released-fall-key-art-for-whitney-prime-suspect-the-playboy-club-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theTVaddict</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fun with Photoshop!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetvaddict.com/?p=26144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier today NBC released an entire slew of fancy artwork touting their new Fall offerings. And while any website can mindlessly post said aforementioned artwork in the seemingly never-ending search for more eyeballs, theTVaddict.com is not just any other website. Which is why, rather than provide the Peacock Network with some incredibly valuable free advertising [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/whitney.jpg" alt="" title="whitney" width="385" height="590" class="border" /></p>
<p>Earlier today NBC released an entire slew of fancy artwork touting their new Fall offerings. And while any website can mindlessly post said aforementioned artwork in the seemingly never-ending search for more eyeballs, theTVaddict.com is not just any other website. Which is why, rather than provide the Peacock Network with some incredibly valuable free advertising <a href="http://web.blogads.com/advertising/thetvaddictcom/top-right-sidebar-above-fold/adspotsfolder/ba_adspotsfolder_revision_create_shortcut?persistent_uid=17c1d310b726435a75d220d2822b4731&#038;persistent_ref=" target="newwindow">(Seriously NBC, would it kill you to buy an ad!)</a>, we thought it would be far more to flex a few photoshop muscles. See for  yourself, what won&#8217;t be coming to a New York City bus shelter anytime soon, after the jump. <span id="more-26144"></span></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/whitney_ours.jpg" alt="" title="whitney_ours" class="border" />See Original Above</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/grimm_ours.jpg" alt="" title="whitney_ours" class="border" /><a href="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/grimm_original.jpg" target="newwindow">Click here to see the original</a></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/primesuspect_ours.jpg" alt="" title="whitney_ours" class="border" /><a href="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/primesuspect.jpg" target="newwindow">Click here to see the original</a></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/theplayboyclub_ours.jpg" alt="" title="whitney_ours" class="border" /><a href="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/theplayboyclub.jpg" target="newwindow">Click here to see the original</a></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/thesingoff_ours.jpg" alt="" title="whitney_ours" class="border" /><a href="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/thesingoff.jpg" target="newwindow">Click here to see the original</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/08/15/advertising-anarchy-we-have-a-little-fun-with-nbcs-just-released-fall-key-art-for-whitney-prime-suspect-the-playboy-club-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faux Your Emmy® Consideration: MAD MEN</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/05/31/faux-your-emmy%c2%ae-consideration-mad-men/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/05/31/faux-your-emmy%c2%ae-consideration-mad-men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 16:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theTVaddict</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetvaddict.com/?p=24295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the 2011 Emmy® nominations just around the corner, theTVaddict.com continues our “Faux Your Emmy® Consideration” series of ads (Also known as our take on how Networks and Studios might wish to consider campaigning for 2011 Emmy® nominations on behalf of their shows and actors) by shining the spotlight on MAD MEN.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/madmen_fauxemmy.jpg" alt="" title="madmen_fauxemmy" width="385" height="578" class="border" /></p>
<p>With the 2011 Emmy® nominations just around the corner, theTVaddict.com continues our <a href="http://www.thetvaddict.com/category/advertising-anarchy/" target="newwindow">“Faux Your Emmy® Consideration”</a> series of ads (Also known as our take on how Networks and Studios might wish to consider campaigning for 2011 Emmy® nominations on behalf of their shows and actors) by shining the spotlight on MAD MEN. <img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/images/favicon.png"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/05/31/faux-your-emmy%c2%ae-consideration-mad-men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faux Your Emmy® Consideration: CASTLE</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/05/26/faux-your-emmy%c2%ae-consideration-castle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/05/26/faux-your-emmy%c2%ae-consideration-castle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 19:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theTVaddict</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Castle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetvaddict.com/?p=24261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the 2011 Emmy® nominations just around the corner, theTVaddict.com continues our &#8220;Faux Your Emmy® Consideration&#8221; series of ads (Also known as our take on how Networks and Studios might wish to consider campaigning for 2011 Emmy® nominations on behalf of their shows and actors) by shining the spotlight on a show that will very [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/castle_faux_emmy_ad.jpg" alt="" title="castle_faux_emmy_ad" width="385" height="578" class="border" /></p>
<p>With the 2011 Emmy® nominations just around the corner, theTVaddict.com continues our <a href="http://www.thetvaddict.com/category/advertising-anarchy/" target="newwindow">&#8220;Faux Your Emmy® Consideration&#8221; series</a> of ads (Also known as our take on how Networks and Studios might wish to consider campaigning for 2011 Emmy® nominations on behalf of their shows and actors) by shining the spotlight on a show that will very likely see little to no Emmy love: CASTLE. </p>
<p>Simply put, if acting like you have yet to succumb to the charm that is Nathan Fillion isn&#8217;t worthy of recognition, we&#8217;re not sure what is! <img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/images/favicon.png"></p>
<p><i>Editor&#8217;s Note: Giving credit where credit is due, the &#8220;Faux Your Emmy Consideration&#8221; title was the brainchild of Twitter Follower <a href="http://www.twitter.com/WriterWarrior" target="newwindow">@WriterWarrior</a></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/05/26/faux-your-emmy%c2%ae-consideration-castle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faux Your Emmy® Consideration: TWO AND A HALF MEN</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/05/25/faux-your-emmy%c2%ae-consideration-two-and-a-half-men/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/05/25/faux-your-emmy%c2%ae-consideration-two-and-a-half-men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 21:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theTVaddict</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising anarchy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetvaddict.com/?p=24227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, theTVaddict.com kicked off our &#8220;Faux Your Emmy® Consideration&#8221; series (Also known as our take on how Networks and Studios might wish to consider campaigning for 2011 Emmy® nominations on behalf of their shows and actors) by shining the spotlight on THE MIDDLE star Eden Sher. Today, we continue doling out free advice for Warner [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/emmy_twoandahalfmen.jpg" alt="" title="emmy_twoandahalfmen" width="385" height="578" class="border" /></p>
<p>Yesterday, theTVaddict.com kicked off our &#8220;Faux Your Emmy® Consideration&#8221; series (Also known as our take on how Networks and Studios might wish to consider campaigning for 2011 Emmy® nominations on behalf of their shows and actors) by shining the spotlight on <a href="http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/05/24/advertising-anarchy-for-your-emmy®-consideration/" target="newwindow">THE MIDDLE star Eden Sher</a>. Today, we continue doling out free advice for Warner Bros. Television properties by offering up our take on how TWO AND A HALF MEN might wish to position itself for award consideration. Oh, and on the off chance co-creator Chuck Lorre is reading this, no need to thank us, a <a href="http://www.chucklorre.com/index-bbt.php">Vanity Card</a> shout-out to theTVaddict.com will suffice. <img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/images/favicon.png"></p>
<p><i>Editor&#8217;s Note: Giving credit where credit is due, the &#8220;Faux Your Emmy Consideration&#8221; title was the brainchild of Twitter Follower <a href="http://www.twitter.com/WriterWarrior" target="newwindow">@WriterWarrior</a></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/05/25/faux-your-emmy%c2%ae-consideration-two-and-a-half-men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faux Your Emmy® Consideration: THE MIDDLE&#8217;s Eden Sher</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/05/24/advertising-anarchy-for-your-emmy%c2%ae-consideration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/05/24/advertising-anarchy-for-your-emmy%c2%ae-consideration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 22:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theTVaddict</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eden Sher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emmy Coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the middle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetvaddict.com/?p=24210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the deadline for 2011 Primetime Emmy® Nominations fast approaching, one of the things you may-or-may-not have begun to notice across &#8220;industry&#8221; websites such as Deadline and The Hollywood Reporter are &#8220;For Your Consideration&#8221; ads. And while we certainly are the first to applaud any attempt on behalf of either the Networks or Studios to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/eden_emmy.jpg" alt="" title="eden_emmy" width="385" height="578" class="border" /></p>
<p>With the deadline for 2011 Primetime Emmy® Nominations fast approaching, one of the things you may-or-may-not have begun to notice across &#8220;industry&#8221; websites such as <a href="http://www.deadline.com/" target="newwindow">Deadline</a> and <a href="" target="newwindow">The Hollywood Reporter</a> are &#8220;For Your Consideration&#8221; ads. And while we certainly are the first to applaud any attempt on behalf of either the Networks or Studios to shine the spotlight on deserving talent both in front and behind of the camera involved in some of your and our favorite shows, we couldn&#8217;t help but find ourselves somewhat underwhelmed with the tone of the ads. Which is why, we here at theTVaddict.com thought it might be fun to take a stab at concocting a few slightly tongue-in-cheek advertisements of our own, starting with the always deserving star of THE MIDDLE Eden Sher. <img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/images/favicon.png"></p>
<p><i>Editor&#8217;s Note: Giving credit where credit is due, the &#8220;Faux Your Emmy Consideration&#8221; title was the brainchild of Twitter Follower <a href="http://www.twitter.com/WriterWarrior" target="newwindow">@WriterWarrior</a></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/05/24/advertising-anarchy-for-your-emmy%c2%ae-consideration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising Anarchy: COUGAR TOWN</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/04/13/advertising-anarchy-cougar-town/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/04/13/advertising-anarchy-cougar-town/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theTVaddict</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cougar Town]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetvaddict.com/?p=22979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since ABC has inexplicably neglected to tell anybody that COUGAR TOWN returns next week with not just one, but two brand new episodes, this TV Addict has once again decided to take it upon ourselves to show network marketing departments how it&#8217;s done with the latest instalment of our ongoing Advertising Anarchy series (Also known [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/drinkingwiththestars.jpg" alt="" title="drinkingwiththestars" width="385" height="578" class="border" /></p>
<p>Since ABC has inexplicably neglected to tell anybody that <strong>COUGAR TOWN</strong> returns next week with not just one, but two brand new episodes, this TV Addict has once again decided to take it upon ourselves to show network marketing departments how it&#8217;s done with the latest instalment of our ongoing <a href="http://www.thetvaddict.com/category/advertising-anarchy/" target="newwindow">Advertising Anarchy</a> series (Also known as our slightly tongue-in-cheek take on how networks might wish to consider promoting some of our favorite new and returning shows). Just call us Don Draper 2.0. <img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/images/favicon.png"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/04/13/advertising-anarchy-cougar-town/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising Anarchy: SKINS Gets the PTC Seal-of-Unapproval</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/01/13/advertising-anarchy-skins-gets-the-ptc-seal-of-unapproval/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/01/13/advertising-anarchy-skins-gets-the-ptc-seal-of-unapproval/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 19:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theTVaddict</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetvaddict.com/?p=20506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taking much of the challenge and creativity out of our latest instalment of Advertising Anarchy (Also known as our take on how networks might wish to consider promoting some of our favorite new and returning shows) comes the Parent&#8217;s Television Council. Particularly President Tim Winter, who for some inexplicable reason thinks its sound strategy to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/advertising_anarchy.jpg" alt="" title="advertising_anarchy" width="385" height="578" class="border" /></p>
<p>Taking much of the challenge and creativity out of our latest instalment of <a href="http://www.thetvaddict.com/category/advertising-anarchy/" target="newwindow">Advertising Anarchy</a> (Also known as <i>our</i> take on how networks might wish to consider promoting some of our favorite new and returning shows) comes the Parent&#8217;s Television Council. Particularly President Tim Winter, who for some inexplicable reason thinks its sound strategy to <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/live-feed/ptc-calls-mtvs-skins-dangerous-71513" target="newwindow">publicly blast</a> the upcoming <strong>SKINS</strong> reboot (Premiering Monday at 10PM on MTV, TMN in Canada) by calling it &#8220;the most dangerous show for children that we have ever seen.&#8221; And who in their right mind would want to see that! <img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/images/favicon.png"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/01/13/advertising-anarchy-skins-gets-the-ptc-seal-of-unapproval/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising Anarchy: How the CW *Should* Be Promoting SMALLVILLE&#8217;s Final Season!</title>
		<link>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/01/06/advertising-anarchy-how-the-cw-should-be-promoting-smallvilles-final-season/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/01/06/advertising-anarchy-how-the-cw-should-be-promoting-smallvilles-final-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theTVaddict</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smallville]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetvaddict.com/?p=20251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As much as we absolutely adore the recently-released teaser poster for SMALLVILLE&#8217;s final season (Yes, we&#8217;re a complete sucker for clever use of shadow), we can&#8217;t help but think it&#8217;s missing a little something. Something that we&#8217;ve added in our latest instalment of Advertising Anarchy (Also known as our take on how networks might wish [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/smallville_poster.jpg" alt="" title="smallville_poster" width="385" height="578" class="border" /></p>
<p>As much as we absolutely adore the <a href="http://dcu.blog.dccomics.com/2011/01/04/dcu-in-2011-destiny-is-now/" target="newwindow">recently-released teaser poster</a> for <b>SMALLVILLE&#8217;s</b> final season (Yes, we&#8217;re a complete sucker for clever use of <a href="http://www.kemple.us/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/star_wars_episode_one_the_phantom_menace_ver1.jpg" target="newwindow">shadow</a>), we can&#8217;t help but think it&#8217;s missing a little something. Something that we&#8217;ve added in our latest instalment of <a href="http://www.thetvaddict.com/category/advertising-anarchy/" target="newwindow">Advertising Anarchy</a> (Also known as <i>our</i> take on how networks might wish to consider promoting some of our favorite new and returning shows). Agreed? <img src="http://www.thetvaddict.com/images/favicon.png"> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/01/06/advertising-anarchy-how-the-cw-should-be-promoting-smallvilles-final-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

